32 F. high on Tuesday in the Twin Cities.
32 F. average high on February 24.
14 F. high on February 24, 2014.

1″ snow on the ground.
4.7″ snow so far in February.
17.5″ fell on the metro area as of February 24, 2014.

February 24, 1934: Late season cold snap with a low of -46 at Big Falls.

Oddly Incomplete

“It’s too cold to work in the garage” my wife complained the other day. “When is it going to get warmer?” May, I answered. “Seriously?”

I do see an abrupt shift in the upper level pattern the second week of March. A massive ridge of high pressure builds over the Plains, treating us to 30s, maybe a few 40s.


Cue Minnesota’s legions of incredulous snow lovers. “What happened to winter?” It seems very odd to be getting the cold without the snow. It’s a little like Adam without Eve, Minneapolis without St. Paul, The Suburbs without Chan Poling. Just. Not. Right.

I’ll get complaints from stressed commuters, grateful for fewer mornings of skating-rink-conditions, but a total lack of snow on the ground in late February, like there is now south & west of the Minnesota River, is a bit surreal, and doesn’t fill me with hope we’ll experience a drought-free 2015.

Our nagging snow recession lingers into at least mid-March; a few bursts of snow from assorted clippers, but nothing that will show up on The Weather Channel. The next 36 hours will be character-building, but 30s return by early next week, before the next Canadian relapse.

Storm-free. Weakening cold waves. Winter may end with a fizzle. Hold on. Better days ahead. In the words of Dan Rather…courage.
What Is The “Polar Vortex” Anyway? NOAA does a very good job explaining a term that’s been around for a long time, one that got hijacked by popular media last winter. And no, this winter is not Exhibit A of the Polar Vortex. Here’s a clip: “…The jet stream snakes around the globe like a ring on the southernmost periphery of the circulation.  The shape of the polar vortex drives the evolution of the jet stream and subsequently the areas of low pressure that bring us our weather.  The larger and more intense the polar vortex is, the further south the jet stream sets up which is why the polar jet pushes south during the winter.  It is NOT the result of climate change whatsoever, although climate change may influence its behavior.  The polar vortex has been around since the Earth had an atmosphere.”

Clipped Again. A plowable snowfall is likely from South Dakota into far southwest Minnesota and Iowa. We can’t even get a healthy snowfall from an Alberta Clipper this winter. 60-hour accumulated snow: NOAA NAM and Ham Weather.

Ski Arkansas. Cold air has penetrated unusually far south (for late February) setting the stage for another snow and ice event from Dallas to Huntsville, north Georgia, the Carolinas and Tidewater of Virginia, where plowable snowfall amounts are possible.

Hints of Relative Warmth. Kind of sad (and pathetically wondrous) how good low 30s feel in late February after a few cold weeks. Yesterday, if you squinted just right, you could make out the vague form of spring-to-come, but that illusion evaporates today and tomorrow as another surge of cold air arrives. Not as cold as a few days ago but numb enough. A thaw arrives the first half of next week; you’ll be shocked to hear that no significant snow, ice or rain is in sight.

F-F-F-February. With a February like this who needs January? The consistent chill is supressing the main storm track well south of Minnesota, meaning fewer icy commutes, but a sense of general malaise for snow lovers (“ripped off again this winter”). It won’t be as cold as last week, but the next 36 hours will be a blunt reminder that meteorological spring doesn’t start until Sunday, March 1. 2-meter NAM temperatures: NOAA and Ham Weather.

Phase Shift. 500 mb winds valid Tuesday evening, March 10, carve out a big ridge over the central USA and Canada, allowing milder Pacific air to surge inland, meaning 30s, even a few 40s close to home (especially southwest Minnesota, where there’s little snow on the ground as of Tuesday night). It should start to look and feel like March within 2 weeks; vague hints of a muddy spring to come. Source: GrADS:COLA/IGES.

Not Quite “Circle Me Bert!” Please square me with red, Paul. Restore my confidence in March while you’re at it. Temperatures cool down again late next week before recovering into the 30s to near 40 the second week of March, based on GFS guidance.

Dakota County Will Sound Sirens Less Often. A step in the right direction? Here’s an excerpt from The Star Tribune: “In an effort to combat “siren fatigue,” Dakota County is likely to sound its weather sirens less often. Outdoor sirens typically have been activated during tornado warnings and any severe thunderstorm warnings, which meant the sirens were used 96 times from 2010 to 2014. But under a new policy recommended by the National Weather Service, the county’s sirens will be activated only during tornado warnings and for storms where wind speed is expected to hit 70 miles per hour or more…”
Minnesota’s Biggest Polluters Spending Over $10 Million to Pollute Politics. Environment Minnesota has the press release, here’s an excerpt that caught my eye: “…Right now, polluters are lobbying their allies on Capitol Hill to derail EPA’s plan to restore Clean Water Act protections to 47,000 miles of streams in Minnesota. Loopholes in the law currently leave the waterways that feed the drinking water for 970,000 at risk. “When powerful special interests spend millions to influence our elections and lobby decisionmakers, they drown out the voices of everyday Americans.” said Minneapolis City Council Member Cam Gordon. “To make sure we’re able to protect our environment and our health, we need reforms to stop the flow of big money into politics.…”
Polluting Politics. The complete 21 page (PDF) report from Environment Minnesota is here.
Is Drought The New Normal for Southern California? The Los Angeles Times has a harrowing story about trends in The Southland. Let’s hope those climate models are wrong, but recent history would suggest that Californians should continue to pay attention. Here’s a snippet: “…Increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is altering Earth’s most important atmospheric weather cell, drawing more moisture into the deep tropics and broadening areas of drought at higher latitudes, according to a new study. The U.S. west, including Southern California, as well as swaths of subtropical Brazil that are suffering from acute drought lie in the heart of the decreased rainfall band shown in 33 climate scenarios run over a 140-year span, according to the study published online Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences…”

Photo credit above: “In this Feb. 4 2014 file photo, a warning buoy sits on the dry, cracked bed of Lake Mendocino near Ukiah, Calif. As bad as the drought in California and the Southwest was last year and in the Midwest a couple years ago, scientists say far worse historic decades-long dry spells are coming. “Unprecedented drought conditions” – the worst in more than 1,000 years – are likely to come to the Southwest and Central Plains near the end of this century and stick around because of global warming, according to a new study in the journal Science Thursday.” (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)
Paper Details. The new paper referenced by the L.A. Times above is available from pnas.org.
Don’t Weather-Shame Washington D.C. Here’s an excerpt of an interesting story at U.S. News and World Report: “…This isn’t a battle of toughness. This is a loudly clanging warning about climate change. The world is indeed getting warmer – 2014 was the warmest year in modern history – and severe weather patterns are a consequence of that. No, we can’t blame any of Boston’s snowstorms, individually, on climate change, any more than a heart attack victim can attribute the event to the double cheeseburger eaten the previous day. This is about long-term, sustained changes in climate and weather. The number of severe, regional snowstorms since 1960 is more than double that of the previous 60 years, according to a report in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Where will it be in 60 more years?…” (File photo: AP).

* The research paper referenced above is here, courtesy of UCAR.
Cities Spark More Thunderstorms Than Rural Areas. It’s something I’ve noticed for decades now, dust and particulant pollution can “seed” clouds and spark more showers and thunderstorms downwind over the suburbs. Here’s an excerpt from an interesting story at Discovery News: “…Some big cities, particularly those located in hot and humid environments, actually spawn more thunderstorms than surrounding rural areas. That’s the conclusion of a new study by Northern Illinois University researchers, which was published in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. The scientists found thunderstorm “births” were significantly higher on weekdays compared with weekend days, suggesting that increased pollution levels related to industry and commuting may play a role...”
Better Prepared? What Meteorologists Learned From Hurricane Sandy. NJ Spotlight has a story focused on lessons learned; here’s an outtake: “…As the largest hurricane on record when it made landfall two years ago, Sandy presented a variety of challenges for forecasters and emergency management officials. Some have since been addressed, but many others remain. Communication problems meant that residents didn’t understand the true nature of the threat or how it would affect them; warnings were misinterpreted; and people failed to take them seriously. Above all, there was a pervasive mistrust of the predictions, with many people falsely believing that the storm couldn’t be as bad as forecasts suggested, since they had never experienced anything of that magnitude…” (File image above: NASA).
A Thirsty, Violent World. The author of the article at The New Yorker argues that we can and will find substitutes for oil and natural gas – as resources become scare substitutes often take their place. Clean water? Not so much. Here’s an excerpt: “…Rapid climate change, population growth, and a growing demand for meat (and, thus, for the water required to grow feed for livestock) have propelled them into a state of emergency. Millions of words have been written, and scores of urgent meetings have been held, since I last wrote about this issue for the magazine, nearly a decade ago; in that time, things have only grown worse. The various physical calamities that confront the world are hard to separate, but growing hunger and the struggle to find clean water for billions of people are clearly connected…”
An Illustrated Guide to Ben Lecompte’s Nightmares. And here I thought the mile swim was a big deal in the Boy Scouts. How about swimming from Japan to California? Outside Magazine has the jaw-dropping details; here’s an excerpt: “This spring, 47-year-old Frenchman Ben Lecomte will step into the Pacific Ocean in Japan and, over the next five months, attempt to become the first swimmer to cover the 5,500 miles to California. His plan: swim eight hours a day—using flippers and a snorkel but no flotation device—then rest for 16 hours on his support boat. We’d doubt his prospects if he hadn’t become the first person to swim 3,700 miles across the Atlantic in 1998…”
“Raht Racer” on Kickstarter. I know Rich Kronfeld, who is raising money via Kickstarter to build and distribute his Raht Racer. It’s a cool concept and I wish him well as he tries to make this go mainstream. Here’s a quick overview: “The RAHT RACER™ is a power biking vehicle that uses state of the art pedal-electric hybrid technology to amplify pedal power, enabling the rider’s legs to propel the vehicle up to highway speeds, giving the rider the feeling of super strength.  On a bicycle, your pedals are the accelerator.  Same with the Raht Racer, only multiplied a hundred times! The result is a breathtaking new, Iron Man-like, power-sport experience.  Safer than a motorcycle, or bicycle on a busy street, the Raht has an integrated roll cage, reinforced carbon fiber body and automotive safety features like headlights, tail lights, seat belts & air bag. What you see here is our first prototype. Its top speed is roughly 70 mph. Our goal is to begin development of our actual production model this year. It will have a top speed of about 100 mph…” Kronfeld writes: “We’re also a finalist in the Clean Energy Trust Challenge and we’ll be on the Science Channel tomorrow night on “All American Makers.”

How Long Can We Stay Awake? 92 days on the toilet? I’ve never seen that in print, and I can’t say I’m a fan. I posted a link to this BBC article just for the mind-boggling statistics: “…It’s surprising how we spend our lives. Reach your 78th birthday and according to some back-of-the-envelope calculations, you will have spent nine of those years watching television, four years driving a car, 92 days on the toilet, and 48 days having sex. But when it comes to time-consuming activities, there’s one that sits head and shoulders above them all. Live to 78, and you may have spent around 25 years asleep. In an effort to claw back some of that time it’s reasonable to ask: how long can we stay awake – and what are the consequences of going without sleep?…”

TODAY: Mostly cloudy, colder. Wind chill: 0. Winds: N 10. High: 14
WEDNESDAY NIGHT: Clear and nippy. Low: -3
THURSDAY: More sun, less warmth. Wind chill: -15. High: 10
FRIDAY: Blue sky, still chilly. Wake-up: -4. High: 15
SATURDAY: Breezy, a bit milder by afternoon. Wake-up: 4. High: 23
SUNDAY: Early flakes, then clearing. Wake-up: 13. High: 29
MONDAY: Mix of clouds and sun, quiet. Wake-up: 16. High: 32
TUESDAY: Mostly gray, almost average. Wake-up: 22. High: 31

Climate Stories…

Obama Vetoes Keystone XL Pipeline Bill. The New York Times has details here.

Burst of Warming May End Lull in Rising Temperatures. New Scientist has the article – here’s an excerpt: “…Global mean surface temperatures have not risen significantly since about 1998, which could be thanks to the oceans sucking up the extra heat. If this turns out to be the case, Chris Roberts from the Met Office in the UK and colleagues have found that there is a 60 per cent chance the hiatus will be followed by a five-year period of rapid warming at twice the usual background rate of around 0.2°C per decade. The models also suggest there is a 15 per cent chance the hiatus will continue for five more years…”

Armageddon For Climate Change Deniers? Not sure about Armageddon, but it confirmed the obvious. Here’s a clip from The Daily Beast: “…For decades, the fossil-fuel industry has been underwriting a huge, successful campaign to lie about climate change. Like the tobacco industry before it, energy companies have created a body of pseudoscience, created by paid lackeys, and successfully co-opted the mainstream of the Republican Party to their “point of view.” This week, that campaign took a serious body blow, as one of its leading pseudo-scientific voices was exposed as a liar and a fraud, having accepted millions of corporate dollars to pose as a climate-change skeptic…”
Editorial: Climate Change is Real, Congress Isn’t. Amen. Here’s an excerpt of an Op-Ed at The Daily Astorian: “…The politicization of just about everything is a benefit to campaign fundraisers and ideological media, but it only yields stalemate. No business would tolerate that approach. In fact, many large corporations have long recognized the dimensions of climate change. The Weyerhaeuser Co. has a climate change strategy. And despite Congress’ standoff, the CIA and the Department of Agriculture long ago admitted this was coming. In raising the alarm about climate change, this high profile group of business people is at odds with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as well as the fossil fuel industry…”
Here’s Where Ocean Acidification Will Hit The U.S. Hardest. Climate Central has the story – here’s an excerpt: “…But the new study published in Nature Climate Change on Monday makes it clear that while ocean acidification may make conditions tougher on shellfish, how much coastal communities rely on those shellfish and how ready they are to deal with changes makes a big difference in how ocean acidification plays out on land. With more than $1 billion in revenue to U.S. coastal communities from mollusks, which the study focuses on, just how prepared those communities are could have huge financial ramifications…”

* The new research on ocean acidification referenced above is available at Nature Climate Change.
Are Siberia’s Mysterious Craters Caused By Climate Change? Scientists Find Four Enormous New Holes in Russia. The Daily Mail takes a look at a rather odd phenomena popping up across Siberia – is there a provable link to a warming climate and thawing permafrost? Here’s an excerpt: “…Four new mysterous giant craters have appeared in the Siberian permafrost in northern Russia, sparking fears that global warming may be causing gas to erupt from underground. Scientists spotted the new holes, along with doszens of smaller ones, int he same area as three other enormous craters that were spotted on the Yamal Peninsulat. The craters are thought to be caused by eruptions of methane gas from the permafrost as rising temperatures causes the frozen soil to melt...” (Photo credit: siberiantimes.com).

Pachauri Steps Down As Head of U.N. Climate Panel. Carbon Brief has an update; here’s the intro: “Dr Rajendra Pachauri has stepped down from his role as chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), effective today. After nearly 13 years in the job, Pachauri was due to step down later this year. However, his departure has been brought forward pending allegations of sexual harassment at the New Delhi-based research centre TERI, where he is director general...”

The Weather Wake-Up Call. Here’s a clip from an Op-Ed at The Hill that got my attention: “…Instill in your children the importance of working on global issues of sustainability. Teach them how to report about climate and food using their smartphones and tablets. Teach the value of nature and science. Demand that media organizations report about sustainability issues more fully than they do. Seek out publications on green living or food safety. Invest in print and online media that have deep and sustained commitments to environmental reporting like National Geographic, Food Tank and other outlets that delve into stories about weather, agriculture, farming and climate…” (Photo credit: NOAA).
Religious Leaders Urge Action to Combat Climate Change. National Catholic Reporter has the story – here’s a clip: “…Given what Pope Francis has said in the past on the environment, “I think that he will call us to prudent action that promotes the common good for present and future generations and respects human life and dignity while always giving priority to the poor and vulnerable,” Wenski said. “Care for creation should engage us all — and thus I also think that the pope will tell us also to be mindful of and heed the voices of poor who are impacted most by climate change and certainly will be impacted either for good or ill by the policies proposed to address climate change…”
Policing The Online Climate Conversation. Forbes takes a look at new online tools that can help consumers of information (all of us) better navigate what is scientifically-based vs. not; here’s an excerpt: “…The Climate Feedback Project is the brainchild of Emmanuel M. Vincent, a post-doctoral research fellow in climate and oceanography at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The project harnesses the power of a browser plug-in known as Hypothes.is, which allows users to highlight and critique select bits of well, really anything that appears online. These annotations then appear to all Hypothes.is users in a panel directly to the right of the text being analyzed…”
No, The Sun Isn’t Driving Global Warming. It did in the past, but there’s no apparent link between spiking temperatures and increased solar radiation reaching Earth. The Washington Post takes a look; here’s a snippet: “…However, the idea that the sun is currently driving climate change is strongly rejected by the world’s leading authority on climate science, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report. “There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance,” the report found…”
Harvard’s Star Alumni Urge Week of Protests on Fossil Fuels. Here’s the intro to a story at Bloomberg Business: “Actress Natalie Portman, environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and other high-profile Harvard University alumni are calling for demonstrations to urge divestment from fossil fuels. Organizers of “Harvard Heat Week” are planning events of “highly civil civil disobedience,” including daily sit-ins for the week of April 13, according to a letter released Friday asking alumni to come to the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, to join the effort...”
Global Warming Changing Weather In The U.S. Northeast. Greg Laden had an article at scienceblogs.com that made me do a double-take; here’s the clip: “…In a recent paper, “Quasi-resonant circulation regimes and hemispheric synchronization of extreme weather in boreal summer,” Dim Coumou, Vladimir Petoukhov, Stefan Rahmstorf, Stefan Petri, and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber noted the emergence of more frequent “Rossby Waves” in the jet stream, indicating that these waves have become more common and more persistent. They said, “We show that high-amplitude quasi- stationary Rossby waves, associated with resonance circulation regimes, lead to persistent surface weather conditions and therefore to midlatitude synchronization of extreme heat and rainfall events. Since the onset of rapid Arctic amplification around 2000, a cluster of resonance circulation regimes is observed involving wave numbers 7 and 8. This has resulted in a statistically significant increase in the frequency of high- amplitude quasi-stationary waves with these wave numbers…”

Photo credit above: “Pedestrians walk single file through snow banks on a Beacon Street sidewalk in Boston, Friday, Feb. 20, 2015. Midway through an epic winter that’s shattered records and buried Boston in more than 8 feet of snow, locals and outsiders alike could be forgiven for wondering why a world-class city that’s accustomed to heavy snowfall — and prides itself on being a global center of technology and innovation — can’t seem to dig out and move on.” (AP Photo/Elise Amendola).